Question 1
A nutritionist records the daily sugar intake (in grams) and the corresponding energy level rating (on a scale of 1–10) for seven participants. The data are shown below.
Sugar intake (g) Energy rating 10 8 20 7 30 6 40 5 50 4 60 3 70 2 Which of the following best describes the correlation between and ?
No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Approach 1Step 1: Identify the trend in the data
As sugar intake increases from 10 g to 70 g, the energy rating decreases consistently from 8 to 2. This indicates a negative direction.
Step 2: Assess the strength of the correlation
The data points decrease very consistently — every 10 g increase in corresponds to exactly a 1-unit drop in . The points would lie almost perfectly on a straight line, indicating strong correlation.
Step 3: Identify the form
The relationship appears linear since the decrease is uniform. The value of would be very close to .
Step 4: Select the correct description
Combining direction (negative), strength (strong), and form (linear), the correct description is strong negative linear correlation.
Method #2Approach 2Step 1: Identify what is being asked
The question asks for the best description of the correlation between sugar intake and energy rating, considering direction, strength, and form.
Step 2: Eliminate 'Strong positive linear correlation'
As increases, decreases — not increases. A positive correlation would require both variables to increase together, so this option is incorrect.
Step 3: Eliminate 'Weak negative linear correlation'
Although the direction is correct (negative), the data is extremely consistent with very little scatter. This rules out 'weak' — the correlation is clearly strong.
Step 4: Eliminate 'No linear correlation'
There is an obvious and consistent downward linear trend in the data, so 'no linear correlation' is clearly incorrect.
Step 5: Select the correct answer
The remaining option, strong negative linear correlation, correctly captures the consistent downward trend in the data.
Question 2
A marine biologist measures the water depth (in metres) and the water temperature (in °C) at eight locations in a lake. The regression line of on is found to be . What is the predicted temperature at a depth of 10 metres?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Approach 1Step 1: Identify the regression equation and required substitution
The regression line is , and we need to predict when .
Step 2: Substitute $d = 10$ into the equation
Step 3: State the answer
The predicted temperature at a depth of 10 metres is 13.9 °C.
Method #2Approach 2Step 1: Identify the calculation required
We must substitute into and match the result to one of the four options.
Step 2: Eliminate $21.6$ °C
This would result from barely changing the intercept (e.g., subtracting only ), suggesting an arithmetic error. , not .
Step 3: Eliminate $14.4$ °C
, which would result from using instead of . This is an incorrect coefficient.
Step 4: Eliminate $13.5$ °C
, which doesn't arise from correct arithmetic with .
Step 5: Select the correct answer
°C, confirming °C is correct.