Question 1
What indeterminate form is produced when evaluating by direct substitution?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct ApproachStep 1: Substitute $x = 0$ into the numerator
The numerator is . At : .
Step 2: Substitute $x = 0$ into the denominator
The denominator is . At : .
Step 3: Identify the indeterminate form
Both numerator and denominator approach as , so the form is .
Step 4: Confirm the answer
The indeterminate form is , which is one of the two forms directly handled by L'Hôpital's Rule.
Method #2Process of EliminationStep 1: Determine what the question is asking
We need to identify which indeterminate form arises when is substituted into the expression.
Step 2: Eliminate $\dfrac{\infty}{\infty}$
The option would require both numerator and denominator to blow up. Since and , there is no blow-up — this option is incorrect.
Step 3: Eliminate $0 \cdot \infty$
The form arises in products, not quotients. This expression is already a fraction, so this option does not apply.
Step 4: Eliminate $1^\infty$
The form arises in exponential expressions of the form . This expression is a simple fraction, not a power, so this option is irrelevant.
Step 5: Select $\dfrac{0}{0}$
Since both numerator () and denominator () equal zero, the correct form is .
Question 2
Using L'Hôpital's Rule, evaluate .No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct ApproachStep 1: Confirm the indeterminate form
At : numerator , denominator . Form is . ✓
Step 2: Apply L'Hôpital's Rule once
Differentiate numerator: . Differentiate denominator: . New limit: .
Step 3: Check if still indeterminate
At : numerator , denominator . Still , so apply L'Hôpital's Rule again.
Step 4: Apply L'Hôpital's Rule a second time
Differentiate again: numerator , denominator . New limit: .
Method #2Process of EliminationStep 1: Recognise the structure
The expression removes the first two terms of the Maclaurin series of . The leading surviving term is .
Step 2: Eliminate $0$
The answer would imply the numerator vanishes faster than , but the Maclaurin expansion shows a non-zero coefficient. This is incorrect.
Step 3: Eliminate $3$
The coefficient would arise from a linear cancellation, but after removing the and terms, the next term involves , giving a coefficient of , not .
Step 4: Eliminate $\dfrac{3}{2}$
The value would correspond to the coefficient of from , not . Since the exponent is , the coefficient is .
Step 5: Select $\dfrac{9}{2}$
The Maclaurin expansion gives , so the limit is .