Question 1
A particle moves along a straight line with velocity m s for . Using technology, how many times does the particle change direction for ?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Approach 1Step 1: Understand when direction changes
A particle changes direction when its velocity changes sign, i.e. when . We need to find how many positive roots has.
Step 2: Factor the equation
Factor out (which is always positive): . Since for all , we need .
Step 3: Analyse intersections graphically
Plot and on a GDC for . At : , , so . As : and , so . The curves must cross at least once.
Step 4: Confirm number of crossings
Using the GDC, the graphs of and intersect at two points for . This means has two positive solutions, so the particle changes direction twice.
Step 5: State the answer
Since there are two sign changes in , the particle changes direction twice.
Method #2Approach 2Step 1: Identify what is being asked
We need the number of times changes sign for , which corresponds to positive roots of .
Step 2: Eliminate 'Never'
Never is incorrect because and as , (since eventually dominates from below zero), so there must be at least one sign change.
Step 3: Eliminate 'Once'
Once would be true if there were exactly one crossing, but graphical analysis shows the exponential and intersect at two values of , giving two roots.
Step 4: Eliminate 'Three times'
Three times would require three positive roots. Graphical inspection confirms only two intersection points, so three changes is an overcount.
Step 5: Select the correct answer
By elimination and graphical confirmation, the velocity changes sign exactly twice for .
Question 2
The position of a drone (in metres) at time days is modelled by . Let be the rate of change of position. Using technology, for how many values of is ?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Approach 1Step 1: Differentiate s(t)
Using the product rule: . Factor out : .
Step 2: Set up the equation to solve
Since always, requires . This equation mixes rational and logarithmic functions, so a graphical/GDC approach is appropriate.
Step 3: Analyse the behaviour
At : LHS , RHS , so RHS LHS. As : LHS and RHS , so RHS LHS. There is a region in between where LHS may exceed RHS.
Step 4: Use GDC to count intersections
Plotting both sides on a GDC shows the curves intersect at two values of , giving two zeros of .
Step 5: State the answer
There are 2 values of for which .
Method #2Approach 2Step 1: Identify what is asked
We need the number of positive values of where the derivative , i.e. stationary points of for .
Step 2: Eliminate 0
0 solutions is incorrect: increases initially (since ... checking: , wait— is negative at and the function must have turning points). The function is non-trivial, so dismissing all stationary points is unreasonable without full verification.
Step 3: Eliminate 3
3 solutions would mean three turning points, which is not supported by a GDC graph of , where only two zero-crossings are visible.
Step 4: Eliminate 1
1 solution would suggest only one turning point. But the shape of — rising then falling then levelling — typically produces two zeros of its derivative, as confirmed by technology.
Step 5: Select the correct answer
The GDC confirms exactly 2 positive values of where .