Introduction to Polar Form
So far you've represented complex numbers as , the Cartesian form. But there's a second, equally powerful representation that uses the geometry of the complex plane instead of coordinates.
Modulus-Argument (Polar) Form: A complex number written as where is the modulus and is the argument of .
The two key quantities are:
- Modulus: , the distance from the origin to the point in the complex plane.
- Argument: , the angle measured anticlockwise from the positive real axis to the line segment . It is computed as with a quadrant adjustment (see below).
The shorthand simply means , and is commonly used in IB problems.
The argument is not unique , adding or subtracting any multiple of gives the same complex number. The principal argument is the value in the range (or sometimes , depending on convention). IB problems usually ask for the principal argument.

Finding the Argument: Quadrant Awareness
The formula only gives the correct argument when is in the first or fourth quadrant (i.e., ). You must adjust for other quadrants.
The clearest approach uses the reference angle , which is always positive and lies in .
| Quadrant | Principal argument | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| I | |||
| II | $\theta = \pi - \arctan!\left(\tfrac{ | ||
| III | $\theta = -\pi + \arctan!\left(\tfrac{ | ||
| IV | $\theta = -\arctan!\left(\tfrac{ |
Using the reference angle is the most reliable method. In Quadrant II, ; in Quadrant III, ; in Quadrant IV, . This avoids the sign confusion that arises from plugging signed ratios directly into .
A very common error is to apply without checking the quadrant. For example, and both have , but their arguments are and respectively , not both . Always sketch the point on an Argand diagram first!
A quick sketch on the Argand diagram takes 10 seconds and prevents quadrant errors entirely. Mark the point, identify the quadrant, then use the table above.